Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-10 20:33:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6CF0ACD968839B06774C409B1692D0AB9E8E3EAB573828BD2CDA79E86546595
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet doesn't claim it's illegal, it points out it is unusual and there's reason to believe he worked with the CIA. The more is making an entirely different argument.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801252041974755363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6CF0ACD968839B06774C409B1692D0AB9E8E3EAB573828BD2CDA79E86546595
  • createdAtMillis - 1739219624599
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801252041974755363A6CF0ACD968839B06774C409B1692D0AB9E8E3EAB573828BD2CDA79E86546595