Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-13 18:56:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 67E5C1CDCDAFC1B65728BFDE1513EDBAA0F04BE7F3A2975F0DCBECF7B5BFCB6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet doesn't claim it's illegal, it points out it is unusual and there's reason to believe he worked with the CIA. The more is making an entirely different argument.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801252041974755363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 67E5C1CDCDAFC1B65728BFDE1513EDBAA0F04BE7F3A2975F0DCBECF7B5BFCB6A
  • createdAtMillis - 1718304979292
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180125204197475536367E5C1CDCDAFC1B65728BFDE1513EDBAA0F04BE7F3A2975F0DCBECF7B5BFCB6A