Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-13 15:23:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A33C8F3B9033C0DF0233171391A7CBADE9850047595F2C1BA3FB46A23A5F3DE4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN – The proposed CN is misleading as only one fact checker finds it ‘unreliable’ while many reputable sources state that the figure is correct. See below for sources supporting the £2,094 figure: https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/sunaks-2000-tax-claim-was-legitimate-but-its-not-the-biggest-issue-n0mjqjstm https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/06/05/treasury-document-reveals-why-labour-cost-you-2000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801250994803605518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A33C8F3B9033C0DF0233171391A7CBADE9850047595F2C1BA3FB46A23A5F3DE4
  • createdAtMillis - 1718292222218
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1801250994803605518A33C8F3B9033C0DF0233171391A7CBADE9850047595F2C1BA3FB46A23A5F3DE4