Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-13 01:27:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1
Participant Details

Original Note:

A comparação deturpa o argumento do tuite anterior. O material genético (sêmen), por si só, não é considerado "vivo" por nenhuma corrente da Ciência. O debate é se a vida surge (ou não) A PARTIR da concepção (união espermatozoide + óvulo) https://m.folha.uol.com.br/ciencia/2010/10/814968-cientistas-defendem-5-momentos-para-inicio-da-vida-humana.shtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1801058680269328796
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1
  • createdAtMillis - 1718242059255
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180105868026932879617A2911D97433821ED441A30F2723075AA0E84FD0AC420CDE324F18749879FD1