Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-12 18:35:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75D612C7FBE85C1D2E266FF8C4D49A5C65E1D343AFE92223532E721BBB810C39
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Post presents a political opinion. Debate for and against taxes in the replies. Please refrain from abusing Community Notes. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/11/civil-service-distances-labour-sunak-lied-tax-row/ https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax claim was perfectly legitimate https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/sunaks-2000-tax-claim-was-legitimate-but-its-not-the-biggest-issue-n0mjqjstm?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1717598734 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800937833936322766
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75D612C7FBE85C1D2E266FF8C4D49A5C65E1D343AFE92223532E721BBB810C39
  • createdAtMillis - 1718217356871
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180093783393632276675D612C7FBE85C1D2E266FF8C4D49A5C65E1D343AFE92223532E721BBB810C39