Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-12 05:48:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F01A17E929F5CA12A37B32E7B8650D984D1D53D3D9D791E674748E3E6A628D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le policier semble demander au vidéaste de « reculer » et on peut entendre le journaliste acquiescer en retour. Cependant, faute d’une autre prise de vue et d’un audio plus net, nous ne pouvons statuer de manière objective sur les propos tenus lors de cette action policière. https://t.co/SyOGEfx3mg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800665041936531642
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F01A17E929F5CA12A37B32E7B8650D984D1D53D3D9D791E674748E3E6A628D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1718171298832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18006650419365316429F01A17E929F5CA12A37B32E7B8650D984D1D53D3D9D791E674748E3E6A628D7