Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 20:11:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7ACCCCED1DC3E0A182CEBEC1C71B6A45D61BEC86678287CD706030F9592D9711
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both NNN notes are bad. One is appeal to authority with no argument against previous CNs. The second one is perpeuating the first one and kind of is ad hominem. The previous CNs don't make fallacial arguments triggered by emotianal response. Original note offers factual context https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800591000714260655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7ACCCCED1DC3E0A182CEBEC1C71B6A45D61BEC86678287CD706030F9592D9711
  • createdAtMillis - 1718136663073
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18005910007142606557ACCCCED1DC3E0A182CEBEC1C71B6A45D61BEC86678287CD706030F9592D9711