Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 19:34:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55E5EA57444F589CC4F8089AC9DF6B052158579A586AD9463815E0BF678B85D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both NNN notes are bad. One is appeal to authority with no argument against previous CNs. The second one is perpeuating the first one and kind of is ad hominem. The previous CNs don't make fallacial arguments triggered by emotianal response. Original note offers factual context https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800591000714260655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 55E5EA57444F589CC4F8089AC9DF6B052158579A586AD9463815E0BF678B85D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1718134457239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180059100071426065555E5EA57444F589CC4F8089AC9DF6B052158579A586AD9463815E0BF678B85D7