Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 19:26:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D3A9C1D91C925038C7ACE2A840EA346A888F00C7FC9397C088488A8EB51C2E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both NNN notes are bad. One is appeal to authority with no argument against previous CNs. The second one is perpeuating the first one and kind of is ad hominem. The previous CNs don't make fallacial arguments triggered by emotianal response. Original note offers factual context https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800591000714260655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D3A9C1D91C925038C7ACE2A840EA346A888F00C7FC9397C088488A8EB51C2E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1718133961434
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18005910007142606553D3A9C1D91C925038C7ACE2A840EA346A888F00C7FC9397C088488A8EB51C2E9