Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 18:34:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18D54C2A6A0F521B56664683CAEACD2EA090A0521E15253413082584C24A728D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both NNN notes are bad. One is appeal to authority with no argument against previous CNs. The second one is perpeuating the first one and kind of is ad hominem. The previous CNs don't make fallacial arguments triggered by emotianal response. Original note offers factual context https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800591000714260655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18D54C2A6A0F521B56664683CAEACD2EA090A0521E15253413082584C24A728D
  • createdAtMillis - 1718130851805
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180059100071426065518D54C2A6A0F521B56664683CAEACD2EA090A0521E15253413082584C24A728D