Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 19:28:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E57EEE0755856CB2F2FE18E6F372BFC712085D11E731765BDFC59BF935BEEF0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Without trying to correct the post, further context reveals that the painting is not damaged because it is protected by a layer of acrylic glass. https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/11/style/king-charles-portrait-vandalized/index.html https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1909936/king-charles-portrait-vandalised

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800544622147416316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E57EEE0755856CB2F2FE18E6F372BFC712085D11E731765BDFC59BF935BEEF0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1718134120559
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1800544622147416316E57EEE0755856CB2F2FE18E6F372BFC712085D11E731765BDFC59BF935BEEF0F