Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-12 02:19:34 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322
Participant Details

Original Note:

Without trying to correct the post, further context reveals that the painting is not damaged because it is protected by a layer of acrylic glass. https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/11/style/king-charles-portrait-vandalized/index.html https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1909936/king-charles-portrait-vandalised

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800544622147416316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322
  • createdAtMillis - 1718158774368
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1800544622147416316003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322