Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 21:06:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC6B9AD406B1BA85B03B7F70731699F75F1A684FD7AD4B344B799C09C39381AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Poster is incorrect in their assessment, it feels they are biased because they are trans themselves https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15567621/ "sex differences in pelvic morphology were large enough to allow sexing the individuals with 100% accuracy"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800527472821227877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CC6B9AD406B1BA85B03B7F70731699F75F1A684FD7AD4B344B799C09C39381AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1718139986162
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1800527472821227877CC6B9AD406B1BA85B03B7F70731699F75F1A684FD7AD4B344B799C09C39381AA