Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 15:20:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 793010E0C6F626C5A340EEC71BCA714B563ADE360E7C22B1FD8EE4D2A20A99BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Poster is incorrect in their assessment, it feels they are biased because they are trans themselves https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15567621/ "sex differences in pelvic morphology were large enough to allow sexing the individuals with 100% accuracy"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800527472821227877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 793010E0C6F626C5A340EEC71BCA714B563ADE360E7C22B1FD8EE4D2A20A99BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1718119250239
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1800527472821227877793010E0C6F626C5A340EEC71BCA714B563ADE360E7C22B1FD8EE4D2A20A99BC