Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 19:27:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D3A9C1D91C925038C7ACE2A840EA346A888F00C7FC9397C088488A8EB51C2E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Poster is incorrect in their assessment, it feels they are biased because they are trans themselves https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15567621/ "sex differences in pelvic morphology were large enough to allow sexing the individuals with 100% accuracy"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800527472821227877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D3A9C1D91C925038C7ACE2A840EA346A888F00C7FC9397C088488A8EB51C2E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1718134029513
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18005274728212278773D3A9C1D91C925038C7ACE2A840EA346A888F00C7FC9397C088488A8EB51C2E9