Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 21:25:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A978FFF419FE781696690E750CAE7B2C88F830E75AD3DFD30C0922083DE85FDA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Pavlou did not receive a $10,000 fine, he received two fines totalling $1000 for failing to obtain consent from the council before communicating an advertising matter. The $10,000 accrued after Pavlou unsuccessfully appealed the magistrate’s decision not to overturn the fines. https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2024/QDC24-073.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1800524697622470852
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A978FFF419FE781696690E750CAE7B2C88F830E75AD3DFD30C0922083DE85FDA
createdAtMillis - 1718141131229
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1800524697622470852A978FFF419FE781696690E750CAE7B2C88F830E75AD3DFD30C0922083DE85FDA