Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 18:55:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77E415B7E84E1F1267A68272299DBBB16F3902D60A59640EE03299BC4983774A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Pavlou did not receive a $10,000 fine, he received two fines totalling $1000 for failing to obtain consent from the council before communicating an advertising matter. The $10,000 accrued after Pavlou unsuccessfully appealed the magistrate’s decision not to overturn the fines. https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2024/QDC24-073.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1800524697622470852
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 77E415B7E84E1F1267A68272299DBBB16F3902D60A59640EE03299BC4983774A
createdAtMillis - 1718132119697
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 180052469762247085277E415B7E84E1F1267A68272299DBBB16F3902D60A59640EE03299BC4983774A