Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 13:54:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78F0D573729C0F8E9AF9A87A1C3CF8D3FC47FF3D509CCBD1B4E9A8E7E1735041
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wikipedia is in fact extremely biased towards one specific side. I have been an Editor since its inception and by studying the general Editors History on any "disputed" issue, one can clearly see that a specific narrative will always be enforced. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Skender_Kajoshaj

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1800436151989174494
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 78F0D573729C0F8E9AF9A87A1C3CF8D3FC47FF3D509CCBD1B4E9A8E7E1735041
createdAtMillis - 1718114040279
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 180043615198917449478F0D573729C0F8E9AF9A87A1C3CF8D3FC47FF3D509CCBD1B4E9A8E7E1735041