Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-12 05:07:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 173F5911E6D9B7835BEE937CC7D1404237EBFA33CAAA5E93419919AD903CAA29
Participant Details
Original Note:
Wikipedia is, according to research in top peer-reviewed journals, not biased: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Faer.102.3.343&ref=daluve-o-blog-de-tecnologia-mais-baseado-do-mundo https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/rule-ambiguity-institutional-clashes-and-population-loss-how-wikipedia-became-the-last-good-place-on-the-internet/FC3F7B9CBF951DD30C2648E7DEFB65EE This is especially true for recent political events: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/wikipedia-as-a-data-source-for-political-scientists-accuracy-and-completeness-of-coverage/DAC48E1EB5C400B92487DADDA63D2216
All Note Details