Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 16:37:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BF0A76A52043F7BDB2A64728C703BFECF2AA8C5428400980AF1DC6ABA7A6E6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The 9th Circuit US Court of Appeal in San Francisco, CA has sent a COVID-19 mRNA case back to the lower courts after ruling the injections are not “traditional” vaccines. OP's claim is factual and correct, based upon the ruling of the court. https://www.westernstandard.news/news/us-appeals-court-rules-covid-mrna-shots-could-be-considered-not-traditional-vaccines/55202

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800381928157466842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0BF0A76A52043F7BDB2A64728C703BFECF2AA8C5428400980AF1DC6ABA7A6E6A
  • createdAtMillis - 1718123844884
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18003819281574668420BF0A76A52043F7BDB2A64728C703BFECF2AA8C5428400980AF1DC6ABA7A6E6A