Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 13:05:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E4AF1CE5B88E1D7B200B411693A3268E6C4C72351F03C4BC47D75EC21D34069
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - while that specific claim is not true, it is factually correct that Taylor Swift does have an abnormally large carbon footprint that she is not mitigating. That is the whole point of the post. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2024/02/13/taylor-swift-and-the-top-polluters-department/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800374180774625323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7E4AF1CE5B88E1D7B200B411693A3268E6C4C72351F03C4BC47D75EC21D34069
  • createdAtMillis - 1718111101099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18003741807746253237E4AF1CE5B88E1D7B200B411693A3268E6C4C72351F03C4BC47D75EC21D34069