Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 16:55:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 768E13FCA8A9188761DF8D445D188CBFF852DD9340520221140DA2B1DBB4D0D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - while that specific claim is not true, it is factually correct that Taylor Swift does have an abnormally large carbon footprint that she is not mitigating. That is the whole point of the post. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2024/02/13/taylor-swift-and-the-top-polluters-department/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800374180774625323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 768E13FCA8A9188761DF8D445D188CBFF852DD9340520221140DA2B1DBB4D0D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1718124955624
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1800374180774625323768E13FCA8A9188761DF8D445D188CBFF852DD9340520221140DA2B1DBB4D0D9