Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 13:44:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53C07352A142C92E32EC616D2AD6F7C7A9DE706FE7033EFC855679346EB99B11
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - while that specific claim is not true, it is factually correct that Taylor Swift does have an abnormally large carbon footprint that she is not mitigating. That is the whole point of the post. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2024/02/13/taylor-swift-and-the-top-polluters-department/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800374180774625323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53C07352A142C92E32EC616D2AD6F7C7A9DE706FE7033EFC855679346EB99B11
  • createdAtMillis - 1718113470636
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180037418077462532353C07352A142C92E32EC616D2AD6F7C7A9DE706FE7033EFC855679346EB99B11