Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 20:47:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 02E899D1636E79A33F3351D06C41F180DA7F71927D30CF1EBD4142E8BD66B525
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - while that specific claim is not true, it is factually correct that Taylor Swift does have an abnormally large carbon footprint that she is not mitigating. That is the whole point of the post. https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2024/02/13/taylor-swift-and-the-top-polluters-department/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800374180774625323
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 02E899D1636E79A33F3351D06C41F180DA7F71927D30CF1EBD4142E8BD66B525
  • createdAtMillis - 1718138875136
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180037418077462532302E899D1636E79A33F3351D06C41F180DA7F71927D30CF1EBD4142E8BD66B525