Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 12:18:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71D4D75F9E8FBEF07CBE5419A5C6616CB66827130CD2B62D9660C222FD4EF5DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The current note is incorrect, the article is perfectly clear. The "confusion" in the replies is caused by laziness, illiteracy, bigotry or general stupidity, (or all of these things combined). Making a note that just says "Read past the headline" would be unnecessary so NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800328435102814223
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71D4D75F9E8FBEF07CBE5419A5C6616CB66827130CD2B62D9660C222FD4EF5DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1718108288377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180032843510281422371D4D75F9E8FBEF07CBE5419A5C6616CB66827130CD2B62D9660C222FD4EF5DB