Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 01:39:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58335A725807CE4F4177863CBD8D081EE7061BA47D82B2ED6791BC30A3BB349A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The current note is incorrect, the article is perfectly clear. The "confusion" in the replies is caused by laziness, illiteracy, bigotry or general stupidity, (or all of these things combined). Making a note that just says "Read past the headline" would be unnecessary so NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800328435102814223
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58335A725807CE4F4177863CBD8D081EE7061BA47D82B2ED6791BC30A3BB349A
  • createdAtMillis - 1718069949961
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180032843510281422358335A725807CE4F4177863CBD8D081EE7061BA47D82B2ED6791BC30A3BB349A