Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 21:08:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The civil servants who wrote some of the costings documents qualified that their findings were “uncertain” and “driven by assumptions provided by special advisers” – who are appointed by the Conservative Party and cannot be considered impartial. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2024/06/its-official-rishi-sunak-2000-claim-is-lie

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800221252222685613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1718053735121
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18002212522226856137468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0