Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 18:12:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EB6A5F92CB7090AF32252C3BB530569CA46A3D6C5682384239C47EDAE8F8269
Participant Details

Original Note:

The civil servants who wrote some of the costings documents qualified that their findings were “uncertain” and “driven by assumptions provided by special advisers” – who are appointed by the Conservative Party and cannot be considered impartial. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2024/06/its-official-rishi-sunak-2000-claim-is-lie

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800221252222685613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EB6A5F92CB7090AF32252C3BB530569CA46A3D6C5682384239C47EDAE8F8269
  • createdAtMillis - 1718043174268
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18002212522226856131EB6A5F92CB7090AF32252C3BB530569CA46A3D6C5682384239C47EDAE8F8269