Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 14:57:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD49EA3227F44E8F97986A14C8F7F2AEB1A4E1D3D054D58DB82A4F017CE258CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post asserts what the ruling has rightfully allowed for, but blurs the line between the assertion and the ruling: Plaintiffs plausibly alleged the COVID-19 vaccine does not “prevent the spread”. Thus, Jacobson (1905 smallpox vaccine mandate ruling) does not apply. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800130676139688359
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD49EA3227F44E8F97986A14C8F7F2AEB1A4E1D3D054D58DB82A4F017CE258CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1729609028981
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1800130676139688359DD49EA3227F44E8F97986A14C8F7F2AEB1A4E1D3D054D58DB82A4F017CE258CD