Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-14 10:37:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9674067F9E872755E1CBD4A4C29639EC92A0168E7AD13588483EA62960631195
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post asserts what the ruling has rightfully allowed for, but blurs the line between the assertion and the ruling: Plaintiffs plausibly alleged the COVID-19 vaccine does not “prevent the spread”. Thus, Jacobson (1905 smallpox vaccine mandate ruling) does not apply. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800130676139688359
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9674067F9E872755E1CBD4A4C29639EC92A0168E7AD13588483EA62960631195
  • createdAtMillis - 1718361437620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18001306761396883599674067F9E872755E1CBD4A4C29639EC92A0168E7AD13588483EA62960631195