Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-11 10:13:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45A196465DD27DA469C88BC865E2FC0E0619116EC2D8C0116C1ADF3E15B48D5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an old misrepresentation. It was debunked over two years ago. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2VK1G1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800035776501051644
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45A196465DD27DA469C88BC865E2FC0E0619116EC2D8C0116C1ADF3E15B48D5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1718100818307
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180003577650105164445A196465DD27DA469C88BC865E2FC0E0619116EC2D8C0116C1ADF3E15B48D5A