Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-30 11:55:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69EF13E8E9AEE9BF41BF3074421097D4D7F8759162951422D0C4E31800DF848D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Every underlying item here is from either the official preliminary results of the forensic ballot audit from the AZ Senate OR new court filings at SCOTUS or the Federal Ninth Circuit.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1800004727540949283
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69EF13E8E9AEE9BF41BF3074421097D4D7F8759162951422D0C4E31800DF848D
  • createdAtMillis - 1730289323493
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180000472754094928369EF13E8E9AEE9BF41BF3074421097D4D7F8759162951422D0C4E31800DF848D