Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 16:52:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC60564F1F003F538A79631F5BDB710B0CFC4178CC89767E9F25A75694BEA8F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court did not rule that the vaccine fails to prevent transmission. It ruled that the plaintiff must be afforded the chance to prove their claim. This is because if true, then LAUSD’s reliance on Jacobson (Supreme court precedent regarding smallpox vax mandate) fails. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799944562326069340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC60564F1F003F538A79631F5BDB710B0CFC4178CC89767E9F25A75694BEA8F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1718038366629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1799944562326069340DC60564F1F003F538A79631F5BDB710B0CFC4178CC89767E9F25A75694BEA8F9