Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 05:15:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6BB0AA2A448F6393ACD95C3F0C1E317FDC3C46C5F16554B6F0E382A73E6EE7C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court did not rule that the vaccine fails to prevent transmission. It ruled that the plaintiff must be afforded the chance to prove their claim. This is because if true, then LAUSD’s reliance on Jacobson (Supreme court precedent regarding smallpox vax mandate) fails. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799944562326069340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6BB0AA2A448F6393ACD95C3F0C1E317FDC3C46C5F16554B6F0E382A73E6EE7C
  • createdAtMillis - 1717996551049
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799944562326069340A6BB0AA2A448F6393ACD95C3F0C1E317FDC3C46C5F16554B6F0E382A73E6EE7C