Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 05:19:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 998C9A41F7CDD39CB6A03CEE8A571C7A9478FFA26A3D2CC93D6ADB3E14DC1C1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court did not rule that the vaccine fails to prevent transmission. It ruled that the plaintiff must be afforded the chance to prove their claim. This is because if true, then LAUSD’s reliance on Jacobson (Supreme court precedent regarding smallpox vax mandate) fails. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799944562326069340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 998C9A41F7CDD39CB6A03CEE8A571C7A9478FFA26A3D2CC93D6ADB3E14DC1C1F
  • createdAtMillis - 1717996791126
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1799944562326069340998C9A41F7CDD39CB6A03CEE8A571C7A9478FFA26A3D2CC93D6ADB3E14DC1C1F