Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 11:02:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66022D34AC7BF28F53D3E501A3D1ACAB096D2CA5E3D487659CFDBB3C389689E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court did not rule that the vaccine fails to prevent transmission. It ruled that the plaintiff must be afforded the chance to prove their claim. This is because if true, then LAUSD’s reliance on Jacobson (Supreme court precedent regarding smallpox vax mandate) fails. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799944562326069340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66022D34AC7BF28F53D3E501A3D1ACAB096D2CA5E3D487659CFDBB3C389689E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1718017322808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179994456232606934066022D34AC7BF28F53D3E501A3D1ACAB096D2CA5E3D487659CFDBB3C389689E8