Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 04:30:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5265521FD61BF1A014CB13C4C2A796E3A83906A008DE527B6C86B750384BEABD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The court did not rule that the vaccine fails to prevent transmission. It ruled that the plaintiff must be afforded the chance to prove their claim. This is because if true, then LAUSD’s reliance on Jacobson (Supreme court precedent regarding smallpox vax mandate) fails. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799944562326069340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5265521FD61BF1A014CB13C4C2A796E3A83906A008DE527B6C86B750384BEABD
  • createdAtMillis - 1717993810045
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17999445623260693405265521FD61BF1A014CB13C4C2A796E3A83906A008DE527B6C86B750384BEABD