Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 21:30:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6117364698F0E5B8DF13621F00FE94F438CA5CF8966DF6883553451E41704D4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The linked article expresses the view that fact checkers such as BBC Verify "aren’t checking facts; they are also checking opinion". By purporting to 'fact check' this opinion, the proposed note illustrates the writer's argument.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799872513251389932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6117364698F0E5B8DF13621F00FE94F438CA5CF8966DF6883553451E41704D4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717968634749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17998725132513899326117364698F0E5B8DF13621F00FE94F438CA5CF8966DF6883553451E41704D4A