Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 14:42:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36D8EBBEDEC0339DC710FAF5E0FAF14C8B40AA8B0CD42D97E4E4C0EAE7F265AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

続くリプライにて根拠となる論文に言及したポストが示されています。 https://x.com/HarrySpoelstra/status/1799720288780755165 「客観的データが不十分」はノート執筆者の判断、即ち個人的意見ですので、コミュニティノートは適しません。リプライ機能で意見すべきです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799794140311687471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36D8EBBEDEC0339DC710FAF5E0FAF14C8B40AA8B0CD42D97E4E4C0EAE7F265AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1717944158915
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179979414031168747136D8EBBEDEC0339DC710FAF5E0FAF14C8B40AA8B0CD42D97E4E4C0EAE7F265AB