Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 15:46:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32C5F6C2EE05BF164915F14656AD3F5701DBC84734DA2349C7DF816B6F03D666
Participant Details

Original Note:

続くリプライにて根拠となる論文に言及したポストが示されています。 https://x.com/HarrySpoelstra/status/1799720288780755165 「客観的データが不十分」はノート執筆者の判断、即ち個人的意見ですので、コミュニティノートは適しません。リプライ機能で意見すべきです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799794140311687471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32C5F6C2EE05BF164915F14656AD3F5701DBC84734DA2349C7DF816B6F03D666
  • createdAtMillis - 1717948001128
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179979414031168747132C5F6C2EE05BF164915F14656AD3F5701DBC84734DA2349C7DF816B6F03D666