Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 23:09:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 185125541AD8CA2A70B1793C6C01FBB092D66E6E3CE016A395E3FAB1591F3B3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

続くリプライにて根拠となる論文に言及したポストが示されています。 https://x.com/HarrySpoelstra/status/1799720288780755165 「客観的データが不十分」はノート執筆者の判断、即ち個人的意見ですので、コミュニティノートは適しません。リプライ機能で意見すべきです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799794140311687471
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 185125541AD8CA2A70B1793C6C01FBB092D66E6E3CE016A395E3FAB1591F3B3B
  • createdAtMillis - 1718060942433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799794140311687471185125541AD8CA2A70B1793C6C01FBB092D66E6E3CE016A395E3FAB1591F3B3B