Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 13:46:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFF95EF10FDE6050CFE20EFAF86BFB2B96A1957ACE4F216C2F06AE2338BC356B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le post constitue une généralisation abusive. Il est impossible de tirer des conclusions à partir de quelques exemples Par ailleurs, les affirmations faites ne sont pas vérifiables par le lecteur. https://tecfaetu.unige.ch/etu-maltt/zelda/dorsazd9/stic-2/ex11/module/MA/la_gnralisation_abusive.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799786350071234895
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFF95EF10FDE6050CFE20EFAF86BFB2B96A1957ACE4F216C2F06AE2338BC356B
  • createdAtMillis - 1717940770350
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799786350071234895EFF95EF10FDE6050CFE20EFAF86BFB2B96A1957ACE4F216C2F06AE2338BC356B