Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 08:08:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B7E7C58BD4A727F07C91051979AEAEBE6D96591F2B8462BC9862857651B9127
Participant Details

Original Note:

The figure is based in part on assumptions made by Conservative appointed special advisers, and is disputed. The assumption that any spending would have to be funded by personal taxation is incorrect. The figure is presented as annual, when it would be spread over four years. https://fullfact.org/economy/conservative-claim-general-election-labour-2000-tax-increase/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799710929782772000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6B7E7C58BD4A727F07C91051979AEAEBE6D96591F2B8462BC9862857651B9127
  • createdAtMillis - 1717920494959
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17997109297827720006B7E7C58BD4A727F07C91051979AEAEBE6D96591F2B8462BC9862857651B9127