Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 08:54:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4791133744552006A53BECD385D7C0D0D7789A909DC8F50D1BC97C93FDF25EF3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The figure is based in part on assumptions made by Conservative appointed special advisers, and is disputed. The assumption that any spending would have to be funded by personal taxation is incorrect. The figure is presented as annual, when it would be spread over four years. https://fullfact.org/economy/conservative-claim-general-election-labour-2000-tax-increase/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799710929782772000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4791133744552006A53BECD385D7C0D0D7789A909DC8F50D1BC97C93FDF25EF3
  • createdAtMillis - 1717923240151
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17997109297827720004791133744552006A53BECD385D7C0D0D7789A909DC8F50D1BC97C93FDF25EF3