Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 10:55:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F585C1302D0B376BB79B4ADB9D0769E8B404A94ED4010D06CE45F6ED09BB5077
Participant Details

Original Note:

Clear example of spurious correlation, where data presentation is manipulated to mislead. Absolute values require absolute comparisons. For relative changes, using percentage change aligns both data series on the same axis for accurate comparison. Here is the corrected axis: https://x.com/goescarlos/status/1799550234319802838?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799574177424298349
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F585C1302D0B376BB79B4ADB9D0769E8B404A94ED4010D06CE45F6ED09BB5077
  • createdAtMillis - 1717930532598
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799574177424298349F585C1302D0B376BB79B4ADB9D0769E8B404A94ED4010D06CE45F6ED09BB5077