Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-12 18:03:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1A8F4B760BBE8B2F8277A3CD1191118AE0FFC86BE791892E4B041B729104772
Participant Details

Original Note:

Clear example of spurious correlation, where data presentation is manipulated to mislead. Absolute values require absolute comparisons. For relative changes, using percentage change aligns both data series on the same axis for accurate comparison. Here is the corrected axis: https://x.com/goescarlos/status/1799550234319802838?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799574177424298349
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1A8F4B760BBE8B2F8277A3CD1191118AE0FFC86BE791892E4B041B729104772
  • createdAtMillis - 1718215438663
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799574177424298349E1A8F4B760BBE8B2F8277A3CD1191118AE0FFC86BE791892E4B041B729104772