Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 02:25:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1F37EA28EE0739B4CAAD8E6A1BE3B6FDE8CE354610C707008F43E5E0B413E3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Clear example of spurious correlation, where data presentation is manipulated to mislead. Absolute values require absolute comparisons. For relative changes, using percentage change aligns both data series on the same axis for accurate comparison. Here is the corrected axis: https://x.com/goescarlos/status/1799550234319802838?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799574177424298349
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1F37EA28EE0739B4CAAD8E6A1BE3B6FDE8CE354610C707008F43E5E0B413E3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1717899947448
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799574177424298349D1F37EA28EE0739B4CAAD8E6A1BE3B6FDE8CE354610C707008F43E5E0B413E3D