Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 15:27:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86C7228EC6C78EE62E9940AD9D4A2C076438834A3A1C114A0580B54B2545A47E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Clear example of spurious correlation, where data presentation is manipulated to mislead. Absolute values require absolute comparisons. For relative changes, using percentage change aligns both data series on the same axis for accurate comparison. Here is the corrected axis: https://x.com/goescarlos/status/1799550234319802838?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799574177424298349
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86C7228EC6C78EE62E9940AD9D4A2C076438834A3A1C114A0580B54B2545A47E
  • createdAtMillis - 1717946842312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179957417742429834986C7228EC6C78EE62E9940AD9D4A2C076438834A3A1C114A0580B54B2545A47E