Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 15:03:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1A525DB96C773AE90184BD64124068FC34E653AFB91A158298C786B812D44F4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Clear example of spurious correlation, where data presentation is manipulated to mislead. Absolute values require absolute comparisons. For relative changes, using percentage change aligns both data series on the same axis for accurate comparison. Here is the corrected axis: https://x.com/goescarlos/status/1799550234319802838?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799574177424298349
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1A525DB96C773AE90184BD64124068FC34E653AFB91A158298C786B812D44F4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1717945423579
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17995741774242983491A525DB96C773AE90184BD64124068FC34E653AFB91A158298C786B812D44F4F