Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 22:34:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE10F7662C1225B62A2B801ACB5DB60C2AAB63AEDCFB37818FCFCFB8BE2765C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Historians continue to learn more about Watergate. Substantial, compelling, but not conclusive, evidence points to intelligence agencies' knowledge and involvement in the scandal. OP expresses an opinion based on compelling evidence. Link below is a credible source: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/06/is-there-anything-to-learn-about-watergate-new-history-says-yes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799566082946073045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE10F7662C1225B62A2B801ACB5DB60C2AAB63AEDCFB37818FCFCFB8BE2765C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1717972440297
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799566082946073045AE10F7662C1225B62A2B801ACB5DB60C2AAB63AEDCFB37818FCFCFB8BE2765C0